Nacho López:
to have something to say

A John Mraz exhibition

The undeniable existence of the apparently invisible, the dignity of the seemingly insignificant, and the quest for an esthetic to render their testimonies were at the heart of Nacho López’s photography for illustrated magazines during the 1950s.

Digital resource

He constructed his own definition of "lo mexicano" by documenting the plurality of many Mexicos in his photoessays about “worlds apart”. The poor, the prisoners, and the Amerindians who peopled some of his finer photoessays were distant from the middle-class readers of the illustrated magazines. And, they also came from other universes than the homogenous vision offered by the party dictatorship of the pri (Partido Revolucionario Institucional): presidential preeminence, the monopoly of power, the skilled manipulation of mass organizations, and the dilution of class difference and ideology in the dissolvent of nationalism.

He explained his critical position by referring to his early education, “The socialist education I received as an adolescent during the reign of Lázaro Cárdenas (1934-1940) left a profound imprint on my soul.” Fusing social commitment with formal exploration makes him part of a very select company of great photographers, including Tina Modotti, Paul Strand, Walker Evans, Dorothea Lange, Paolo Gasparini, Sebastião Salgado, and the photographer who most he admired and resembles, W. Eugene Smith. And it is precisely that dialectic that made Nacho the extraordinary imagemaker he was.

His photoessays were published in the most important Mexican illustrated magazines, among them, Hoy, Mañana, y Siempre! (Today, Tomorrow, Always!). He always worked for weeklies, never in newspapers, and almost never covered hard news. In fact, I do not believe that his metier was spontaneous or street photography, but the magazine genre of “features” made up of human interest stories. However, photojournalism is a very wide field, and the capacities of photographers should be understood to be as varied as those who write. In spite of the general perception of him as a photoreporter, I think he would be better described as a photoessayist in the majority of his publications.

John Mraz

To have something
to say

“The most important question for photographers is whether they have something to say about reality.”

Nacho López (1979).

Nacho López: ideologist, teacher and photographer

The hundredth anniversary of his birth provides opportunity to remember the artist, his images, his ideals, everything that shaped one of the most important photographers of 20th century Mexico. Ignacio López Bocanegra (Tampico, November 20, 1923 - Mexico City, October 24, 1986), better known as Nacho López, was driving force of photography who pushed far beyond conventional, established, and authorized limits. A man of lofty ideas and left-wing convictions, he showed us a very different path for approaching photography. His camera recreated photojournalism, photoreportage, and above all, innovated with photo essays—, an avant-garde journalistic genre —alongside editors José Pagés Llergo and Regino Hernández Llergo. With the coming of Nacho López, photographers became professionals, independent creators with their own visual grammar, catapulting the profession to another level within the editorial and journalistic world.

It is important to note that Nacho López revealed an unusual Mexico in his work; that of the underworlds, a Mexico that slumbered while life continued on the surface, that of the helpless or dispossessed. Concurrently, he also worked with other subjects such as dance, music, the city, architecture, the countryside, indigenous people in their native land, objects, and a vast array of unusual themes for photography at that time. The genre overflowed with the everyday, treated with a sharp sense of humour, accentuating social and political contradictions. In addition to an aesthetic he developed, his images would penetrate diverse worlds, he was a great teacher and example with his camera, always at the ready. It was part of his way of conversing, contrasting, discussing; he taught his students a sharp-witty and fierce visual discourse. López was one of the few photo creators who used printed words to show us the paths of visual militancy and the need to construct a discourse that would surpass the known. He revealed, taught, and exercised that historical visual consciousness and from it we learned how to comprehend the importance of photography as a documentary, historical, social, and aesthetic source. Furthermore, his interest led him to cinematography with the same zeal.

In the case of this exhibition, it is an honour to share the words and curation of researcher and photo historian John Mraz—the most prominent specialist in the work of Nacho López, who presents the photographer on the hundredth anniversary of his birth through the full force and quality of his images. Thanks to John Mraz, new generations will be able to familiarize themselves with one of the best photographers in Mexico.

Rebeca Monroy Nasr
deh-inah


Legacy

In the period between 1976 and 1985, Nacho taught photography in the Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unam), where he formed several of currently-practicing photojournalists, and was the principle maestro of the movement I have described as the Nuevo Fotoperiodismo Mexicano (New Photojournalism of Mexico). He asserted that:

If a photograph contain only one meaning, it is a document; if it encompasses the contradictions of reality without including one’s own reasoning, it is a narrative; if it synthesizes the two previous factors and, moreover, a reality interpreted with the brain and eye, it is a testimony, and perhaps a work of art.

López wanted to bring about greater respect for photography: "Not so that we can be famous and praised, but to be able to live from the photography through which we realize ourselves.” Hence, he insisted in integrating photography into a photographer’s life, and offered an example of how photojournalism can offer an alternative to the alienation suffered by those for whom it is just another job, those for whom the camera is only a tool that is abandoned at the end of the work day. In the words of Guillermo Castrejón: "For Nacho, photography was part of life, and he showed me how to integrate it into daily life. From then on i understood what photography was, and what it served for.

Elsa Medina described his influence more succinctly: "Nacho taught me to see.”


Curatorship

John Mraz


Bio

John Mraz
Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

John Mraz is Research Professor Emeritus at the icsyh-buap and National Researcher Emeritus. He has published more than 250 articles, book chapters, and essays in Europe, Latin America, and the United States on the uses of modern media in recounting history. Among his recent books are History and Modern Media: A Personal Journey; Photographing the Mexican Revolution: Commitments, Testimonies, Icons; Looking for Mexico: Modern Visual Culture and National Identity; and Nacho López, Mexican Photographer. He has directed award-winning documentaries, and curated many international photographic exhibits. His most recent documentary, Julio Mayo: Bracero with a Camera, and exhibit, Braceros, Photographed by the Hermanos Mayo, is currently circulating in U.S. universities and has been viewed by more than 140,000 visitors.


General bibliography

Mraz, John, Nacho López y el fotoperiodismo mexicano en los años cincuenta, México, Editorial Océano / inah, 1999.

_________, Nacho López, Mexican Photographer, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2003.

Nacho López, fotógrafo de México, Homenaje, México, inba / Museo de Bellas Artes, 2016.

Revista Luna Córnea, núm. 31, Secretaría de Cultura, Centro de la Imagen, 2007.

Rodríguez, José Antonio y Alberto Tovalín Ahumada (eds.), Nacho López, ideas y visualidad, México, inah / sinafo / Universidad Veracruzana / Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2012.